PEOPLE v. VICTORIA R. ARAMBULO

PEOPLE v. VICTORIA R. ARAMBULO Facts: Records show that respondent together with her siblings are the heirs of Spouses Pedro C. Reyes and Anastacia Reyes.  Anaped Estate Inc. (Anaped) was incorporated as part of the estate planning or as conduit to hold the properties of the estate of Pedro Reyes for and in behalf of

PIMENTEL VS PIMENTEL

PIMENTEL VS PIMENTEL FACTS: Respondent filed an action for frustrated parricide against petitioner. Pre-trial and trial were set. Petitioner also filed a petition for the declaration of nullity of marriage under Article 36 of the Family Code. Petitioner received summons of the pre-trial and trial of the Civil Case. He then filed an Urgent Motion

Dreamwork Construction, Inc. vs Janiola

Dreamwork Construction, Inc. vs Janiola FACTS: Petitioner, through its President, and Vice-President, filed a Complaint Affidavit against Janiola for violation of BP 22 at the Office of the City Prosecutor of Las Piñas City. Correspondingly, It also filed a criminal information for violation of BP 22 against respondent with the MTC. Janiola instituted a civil

YAP VS CABALES

YAP VS CABALES FACTS: Petitioner Jesse Y. Yap and his spouse Bessie Yap are engaged in the real estate business through their company Primetown Property Group. Sometime in 1996, petitioner purchased several real properties from  Evelyn Te. In consideration of said purchases, petitioner issued several postdated checks to Evelyn. Thereafter, spouses Orlando and Mergyl Mirabueno

SUPREME TRANSPORTATION LINER v. ANTONIO SAN ANDRES,

SUPREME TRANSPORTATION LINER v. ANTONIO SAN ANDRES, Facts: Ernesto Belchez was driving a passenger bus, Mabel Tours Bus owned by Antonio San Andres. Mabel Tours Bus sideswiped a Toyota Revo it was overtaking. A complaint for damages before the lower court was instituted by [respondent] Antonio San Andres against petitioners alleging actual damage to Mabel

CESAR M. CARANDANG vs. VICENTE SANTIAGO

CESAR M. CARANDANG vs. VICENTE SANTIAGO FACTS:                                                                                        This is a petition for certiorari to annul the order of Judge Vicente Santiago, regarding his suspension of the civil case filed by petitioner Cesar Carandang to Tomas Valenton Sr. and Tomas Valenton Jr. to await the result of the criminal case also filed by petitioner against the

Bobie Rose V. Frias vs Flora San Diego-Sison

Bobie Rose V. Frias vs Flora San Diego-Sison FACTS: Frias owns a house and lot acquired from Island Masters Reality and Development Corporation (IMRDC) through a Deed of Sale and covered by transfer certificate of title (TCT) in the name of IRMDC. The parties of this case entered into a MOA over the subject property.

PADILLA v CA

PADILLA v CA FACTS: Vergara and his family filed a case against respondents for the crime of grave coercion. The information  provides that on February 8, 1964 at around 9AM, the accused prevented Antonio Vergara and his family to close their stall located at the Public Market, Building No. 3, Jose Panganiban, Camarines Norte, and

MERLIN P. CAIÑA v. PEOPLE

MERLIN P. CAIÑA v. PEOPLE FACTS: Petitioner questions the award of damages made by the Municipal Trial Court while acquitting him of the charge of reckless imprudence resulting in serious physical injuries. The award of damages was initially deleted on appeal but was later on reinstated by the RTC upon a motion for reconsideration. The

Banal v. Tadeo

Banal v. Tadeo Facts: Fifteen separate informations for violation of BP Blg. 22 or the Bouncing Checks Law, were filed against respondent Claudio before the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City. After numerous changes in the presiding judges, the public respondent assumed jurisdiction. Public respondent then rejects the appearance of petitioner’s private prosecutor claiming that