ROMEO M. JALOSJOS, JR. v. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND DAN ERASMO, SR.

ROMEO M. JALOSJOS, JR. v. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND DAN ERASMO, SR. FACTS: On November 28, 2009 Jalosjos filed his Certificate of Candidacy (COC) for the position of Representative of the Second District of Zamboanga Sibugay for the May 10, 2010 National Elections. This prompted Erasmo to file a petition to deny due course

ANASTACIO AREVALO v. VALENTIN QUILATAN

ANASTACIO AREVALO v. VALENTIN QUILATAN  FACTS: Petition for review of the split decision on reconsideration of the Court of Appeals in CA G.R. No. 57728-R, Arevalo, et al. vs. Quilatan, et al. which reversed a decision of September 3, 1974 rendered by the Court of First Instance of Rizal in its Civil Case No. 12229

Joaquin VS Navarro

Joaquin VS Navarro FACTS: During the battle of liberation of Manila in 1945, Joaquin Navarro and his family seek refuge on the ground floor of German Club Building. However, the building was set on fire and the Japanese Forces started shooting and hitting the three daughters of said Joaquin Sr. The latter decided to leave

Limjoco vs Intestate Estate of Pedro Fragrante

Limjoco vs Intestate Estate of Pedro Fragrante FACTS: Fragrante, a Filipino citizen, applied for a certificate of public convenience to maintain and operate an ice plant in the Municipality of San Juan and to sell the ice produced from said plant. However, prior to the approval of his application, he died. Considering that his estate

CONTINENTAL STEEL VS MONTANO

CONTINENTAL STEEL VS MONTANO FACTS: Hortillano, an employee of petitioner and a member of a union, whose wife had a pre-mature delivery which resulted to the death of their child, filed a claim for Paternity Leave and Death and Accident Insurance for dependent, pursuant to the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) concluded between Continental and the

Quimiging VS Icao

Quimiging VS Icao FACTS: The parties to the case were neighbors and had a close and confidential relationship even though Icao was already married. Icao succeeded in having carnal knowledge with the petitioner several times through force, intimidation and without her consent. As a result, she became pregnant despite efforts and drugs supplied by Icao.

ANTONIO GELUZ VS PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

ANTONIO GELUZ VS PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES FACTS: Nita Villanueva and petitioner met in 1948 through Nita’s aunt. Two years after, Nita got pregnant and to conceal her pregnancy from her parents, she had an abortion. It was Geluz who performed the abortion on Nita. When Nita got married with private respondent Lazo, she again

ATIZADO VS PEOPLE 

ATIZADO VS PEOPLE  Facts: The petitioners are among those convicted for the murder of Rogelio Llona and were sentenced to an imprisonment of Reclusion Perpetua. They were charged P 50,000 for civil indemnity, P 30,000 for actual damages and P 50,000 as moral damages. In pursuant to RA 9344 or the Juvenile Justice and Welfare

Domingo Mercado v. Jose Espiritu

Domingo Mercado v. Jose Espiritu FACTS: This is an appeal by the bill of exceptions, filed by the counsel for the plaintiffs from the judgment of September 22, 2018, in which the judge of the Seventh Judicial District dismissed the complaint filed by the plaintiffs and order them to keep perpetual silence in regard to

CORAZON CATALAN vs. JOSE BASA

CORAZON CATALAN vs. JOSE BASA FACTS: In 1948, Feliciano Catalan was discharged from active military service because he was unfit to render service by reason of his mental disorder. In 1949, Feliciano married petitioner. In 1951 an Absolute Deed of Donation was executed in favor of Feliciano’s sister, Mercedes Catalan  which is ½ of a